Pairwise Comparison – an objective review

In this paper, we delve deep into the intricacies of Pairwise Comparison, drawing from my extensive involvement in procurement projects across the UK, Europe, and international markets. This technique, born from the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), offers a unique perspective on evaluating and weighting criteria, making it a valuable tool for decision-makers in diverse industries.

Pairwise Comparison isn’t just a theoretical concept; it’s a practical approach that can significantly impact procurement outcomes. This paper explores how Pairwise Comparison can be used for scoring mechanisms and weight setting in the context of procurement tendering evaluations. By understanding the nuances of this technique, you’ll gain insights into optimising your procurement processes and achieving more accurate, fair, and transparent evaluations.

But why should you delve deeper into Pairwise Comparison? What makes it stand out among the various evaluation methodologies available? In this paper, we’ll address these questions and highlight the benefits of Pairwise Comparison, such as its ability to differentiate between solutions effectively and its flexibility in accommodating diverse criteria.

Moreover, we’ll discuss the prerequisites and considerations when using Pairwise Comparison for scoring mechanisms and weight setting, providing you with a comprehensive guide to harnessing its full potential. Whether you’re a procurement professional, an evaluator, or a stakeholder in the decision-making process, understanding Pairwise Comparison can equip you with a valuable tool for achieving better outcomes in complex procurements.

To continue reading, please enter your details below.

Get an overview of how AWARD® supports strategic high risk procurements

Get an overview of how AWARD® supports strategic high risk procurements